Looseness Prevention Countermeasures

EffectFunctionAdaptation example
Initial loosening
countermeasure
Spring pressure Disk spring washers,
spring washers
Collapse loosening
countermeasure
Reducing the surface pressure Highly rigid flat washers
Return rotation
resistance
Stopping mechanical rotation Slotted nuts, split pin-attached bolts,
tongued washers, claw washers
Increasing the screw part’s
degree of adhesion
Sheet metal screws, coiled inserts
Increasing the return torque Non-metallic insert-attached detent nuts
(e.g. nylon, nuts, nylock),
all-metallic detent nuts (e.g. U nuts),
flange-attached bolts
(e.g. flange nuts, skirt nuts),
pre-belling torque form nuts
(e.g. tough lock nuts, space lock nuts)
Return rotation
prevention
Forced locking by eliminating
the fitting gap
Double nuts
Hard Lock Nuts
Solidification and adhesion
within the fitting gap
Anaerobic glue (e.g. Lock Tight),
glue-containing capsule-attached bolts
(e.g. chemical anchor bolts)

 Countermeasures Evaluation

  • A. The return rotation resistance-use group are countermeasures that in almost all cases can prevent any reduction in the pretension force (axial force), which means that their effectiveness against looseness due to return rotation is considered high. However, in the case of double nuts, unless they are completely locked (pinioned), their performance is likely to decline remarkably, as has been shown in variety of tests. Also, anaerobic glue does not exhibit its effectiveness unless it is used in line with the using instructions. Compared with these measures, at the present time Hard Lock Nuts are considered to be the most effective connection method available.
  • B. The return rotation resistance-use group includes methods that do not allow the pretension force to decline by more than a limited extent and others that merely slow down the rate at which the pretension resistance declines. With such methods, the level of reliability varies, with some methods serving only as a means of screw disjointing prevention or dropping prevention.
  • C. It is considered that initial loosening and collapse loosening countermeasures are not usually suitable for preventing loosening due to return rotation. This is because their seating surface prevention functions are poor.